Decision system for IT governance
Not another analysis tool.
Decision system
for IT governance.
ARVANIS evaluates maturity, risks, and action options across 7 dimensions and shows which decision now has the biggest impact on cost, risk, and steerability — methodical, traceable, management-ready.
For CIOs, IT leaders, and managing directors · 50–3,000 employees · ready for management review
Sample profile · mid-market · compressed decision view
7
dimensions in the assessment model
140
structured questions
4
maturity levels per dimension
5
decision-relevant perspectives
How it works
How ARVANIS works
Five steps from input to an actionable decision — methodical, not opinion-based.
Capture the input
Company data, IT setup, pain points, and current initiatives define the starting point.
Concrete sample output
920 employees, 28 IT FTE, 43 business applications, 11 active IT projects, main issue: missing prioritisation.
Quick check
Simulate IT governance in 20 seconds
Three inputs are enough for a first estimate — based on typical mid-market profiles. The simulation provides a prepared orientation for discussing the next step.
Company size
IT team size
Biggest challenge
Run the simulation
Choose your setup and start the analysis for a prepared decision output.Why it matters
If IT is not steerable, cost, risk, and friction rise.
Cost
Current IT steering problem
Too many initiatives compete for the same resources.
Business consequence
Budget gets diluted across side initiatives, external support grows, and execution speed drops.
How ARVANIS resolves it
Structured prioritisation makes clear what should be stopped, bundled, or moved forward.
Risk
Current IT steering problem
Risks are recorded but not translated into hard decisions.
Business consequence
Audit findings, security gaps, and operational risks stay open longer than necessary.
How ARVANIS resolves it
Gap analysis and risk prioritisation reveal the next decision to make.
Steerability
Current IT steering problem
IT reports status while management still has to interpret what matters.
Business consequence
Decisions take too long or get driven by noise rather than impact.
How ARVANIS resolves it
Condensed decision material brings situation and priorities into a management-ready format.
Outputs
Three outputs that move directly into decisions.
No slide deck. No status report. Structured decision material that CIOs and executive teams can use as a robust basis.
Deliverable
Decision basis
Condensed management-ready brief with prioritised decisions, rationale, trade-offs, and next step.
Analysis
Risk analysis
Condensed evaluation of operational, security, and governance risks — prioritised by impact and steering relevance.
Execution
Execution plan
Prioritised actions in a sensible sequence with responsibilities and open dependencies.
Trust
Traceable instead of black box.
Every recommendation is rooted in measurable evaluation — not in a model you have to trust without understanding it.
7 dimensions, 140 questions, 4 maturity levels
Structured evaluation with traceable logic instead of black-box scoring.
Consistent assessment logic
Guided capture, consistent logic, and a comparable baseline instead of one-off interpretation debates.
Your data stays yours
Privacy-oriented platform architecture, role-based access, and traceable processing.
Positioning
Traditional tools show the status. ARVANIS makes it decision-ready.
Transparency alone does not create steerability. The difference lies in the methodical derivation of the next decision.
| Comparison point | Traditional tools | ARVANIS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary output | Dashboard, score, report | Prioritised decision basis with rationale |
| Core value | More transparency | More steerability |
| Prioritisation | Often manual, subjective, or political | Methodical by risk impact, gap delta, effort, and dependencies |
| Risk linkage | Risks sit next to projects and actions | Risks directly feed the assessment and prioritisation |
| Decision-readiness | Shows options but leaves the conclusion open | Derives the next prioritised decisions |
| Management usability | Needs experts or consultants to translate it | Condenses situation and priorities into a management-ready format |
| Execution | Action lists without a hard sequence | Structured prioritisation and a clear sequence instead of loose action lists |
| Traceability | Score without derivation | Assessment and prioritisation follow a traceable logic |
Primary output
Traditional tools
Dashboard, score, report
ARVANIS
Prioritised decision basis with rationale
Core value
Traditional tools
More transparency
ARVANIS
More steerability
Prioritisation
Traditional tools
Often manual, subjective, or political
ARVANIS
Methodical by risk impact, gap delta, effort, and dependencies
Risk linkage
Traditional tools
Risks sit next to projects and actions
ARVANIS
Risks directly feed the assessment and prioritisation
Decision-readiness
Traditional tools
Shows options but leaves the conclusion open
ARVANIS
Derives the next prioritised decisions
Management usability
Traditional tools
Needs experts or consultants to translate it
ARVANIS
Condenses situation and priorities into a management-ready format
Execution
Traditional tools
Action lists without a hard sequence
ARVANIS
Structured prioritisation and a clear sequence instead of loose action lists
Traceability
Traditional tools
Score without derivation
ARVANIS
Assessment and prioritisation follow a traceable logic
Next step
Your next IT decision should not stay unresolved.
ARVANIS condenses maturity, risks, and action options into one clear priority and a traceable decision basis — methodically derived and ready for CIO and executive review.
Focused on decisions. Not on more status.